RESEARCH READING GUIDE / 2 MIN READ

Reading adaptability at the individual level

A theory of individual adaptability proposes how people may respond across changing demands. Distinguish that proposed capacity from a particular successful adaptation and from the opportunities that made it possible.

THE READING QUESTION

A theory of individual adaptability proposes how people may respond across changing demands. Distinguish that proposed capacity from a particular successful adaptation and from the opportunities that made it possible.

Identify the level of the claim

Ployhart and Bliese's I-ADAPT account concerns individual adaptability within a broader discussion of understanding and measuring adaptation. A useful reading distinguishes what a person may bring to a situation from the behavior actually observed in that situation. A successful outcome may reflect individual resources, support, task design, or some combination. The theory does not remove the need to examine those conditions.

A fictional role change

A fictional library employee, Theo, moves from a familiar circulation role to coordinating digital workshops. He learns the booking software quickly but feels uncertain when participants ask unexpected questions. His colleague adapts slowly to the software but handles open discussion comfortably. A manager describes one as adaptable and the other as not adaptable based on whichever task was most visible. That judgment may reflect a narrow observation window. The role contains several demands, and each employee has different prior experience. A useful development plan should identify the specific demand before inferring a general individual characteristic.

Build a demand and resource table

For this exercise, list the new role's demands beside the knowledge, habits, and support each employee can draw on. Distinguish what can be practiced from what requires changes in the environment. Theo might rehearse handling questions, while the team supplies a referral process for topics outside the workshop's scope. The colleague might need structured software practice. Then choose observations that correspond to the intended change. Confidence can improve without task performance improving, and performance can improve while the task still feels effortful. Recording both helps avoid a simplistic story in which one self-report score explains the entire transition.

Questions for the theory chapter

Ask how adaptability is defined relative to personality, knowledge, motivation, and observed performance. What assumptions connect a broad individual characteristic to success in a particular demand? How would the proposed account distinguish prior experience from a capacity to learn? For the fictional library, what evidence would support a general claim across situations rather than a narrow claim about one workshop task? Consider whether the new role provides enough repeated opportunities to observe a pattern. A single difficult incident may be important operationally without being sufficient to characterize the person across all future changes.

A practical but bounded use

Machiavelli Adaptive Capacity is an original reflection framework that can help participants identify situations they find challenging. It does not establish a universal adaptation score or predict success in a new role. Theo's plan should be reviewed through actual practice and feedback. Direct studies of the questionnaire remain necessary before stronger interpretations of its scores could be justified.

FOLLOW THE ORIGINAL SOURCES

Ployhart and Bliese (2006) ↗

Continue the reading

Adaptability begins with the demands of a changing situation →

Acting provisionally without pretending to know →

Reading an adaptive-practices profile without creating a fixed label →

Adaptability research guideAll learning guides